01 / Explanation
A wallet is not a unique human
Signing with a key proves control of that key. Human uniqueness requires additional evidence, anti-Sybil rules, and a way to handle duplicate enrolment and recovery. Identity verification, personhood, and one-person-one-allocation are related requirements rather than interchangeable proofs.
02 / Explanation
Different uses need different consent
The privacy design keeps source document images and full OCR on-device. Minimum derived data may be approved for a specific verification scope. A service should request an available proof for its purpose, not inherit every piece of identity evidence. General marketplace participation does not universally require VEID; individual offerings may set requirements.
03 / Explanation
Inclusion is part of correctness
Evaluate false acceptance alongside false rejection, recovery, disability access, cost, and cross-context linkability. Personhood-credential research identifies deployment and governance challenges; it does not validate VEID. Neither encryption nor a proposed zero-knowledge flow proves that every production implementation has achieved these goals.
What does a valid wallet signature establish?
Next: How an autonomous agent stays within bounds →All guides